I have observed lately that we like to take our cues from the United Kingdom to give reason for our decisions, so I went and researched the role of the speaker in the UK House of Commons to see if I found “reserve” powers of the speaker that we the people seemingly are unaware of based on the last motion in the House regarding this “legal bill.”

I checked the VI Constitutional Order 2007, but found nothing substantive there on the speaker’s role and responsibilities. Meanwhile, I could not find a copy of the Standing Orders on the government’s website, which should never be the case for such an important document to the governance of the territory.

Sidebar: As a matter of fact, the legislature should have its own website, where information like the declarations of interests of members can be found. I do not understand what all the secrecy is about. Check out Bermuda’s parliamentary website as an example. If we are serious about educating our people to political maturity, it means making the information easily accessible.


UK speaker

So off I went to the UK Parliament website and found no surprises there. Check it out for yourself at https://www.parliament.uk/business/commons/the-speaker/.

Two things that I did note of interest were that the UK speaker is an elected member of parliament and resigns from his political party to remain separate from political issues even in retirement.

For clarity, someone needs to explain to we the people what “head” of the House of Assembly means in the press release about the select committee motion. Nothing I have read says a speaker has the authority to make decisions on behalf of the HOA, so the “official capacity” in which he acted is unclear, as is why the assumptions were made in the first place.



All I know is the absurdity needs to stop. Seventy-plus years ago this month, our ancestors took a risk and put their lives on the line to challenge the status quo to get back the Legislative Council. And it is disappointing to see how lightly we take the privilege and responsibility of governing ourselves with these recent antics! I barely watch or listen to proceedings anymore because I do not hear substantial debate that speaks to how legislation is to affect our daily lives. Just rubberstamping of laws, exemptions, or political jousting.

The House is one of our sacred institutions that is supposed to be reflective of the best in us. If the people in there, in whatever capacity, do not respect that or intend to perform their duties in a professional and respectful manner, then it appears to me they need to look for a new job.