The push for the monstrous West End ferry “terminal” still continues, impacting one of the most picturesque harbours in the Caribbean at a time when the territory can ill afford it. The premier and the BVI Ports Authority managing director pointedly ignore protests and expert opinions in hopes of muscling through an oversized structure, calling further delays “Satan’s Plans.” Why the urgency, when it is in everybody’s interest to compromise and get it right? But protests fall on deaf ears.
The project has long been alarming in size and scope, the estimated $40 million far exceeding the projected price of $23-$26 million. Yet, these officials still want to cut costs without compromising on the original plan of a 75,000-square-foot, land-filled, three-story terminal, which is to function like the airport in the small harbour of Sopers Hole.
Questions about additional businesses have been met with the misguided response that revenue from the leases is needed to support such a big project. The bigger the building, the more businesses are needed. Wouldn’t it be easier and cheaper to cut back the building to its basic function: that of processing visitors? Tourists are not here to look at the point of entry; they are eager to experience authentic culture and a relaxed environment.
The Ports Authority’s argument of 30,000 visitors a month (or 1,000 people a day) entering West End is unsubstantiated, and the number is questioned by West End customs and immigration officers themselves. There are a limited number of people who can enter the territory at any given time via St. Thomas ferries and private yachts. Cheaper bids raise the risk of shoddy workmanship, which would contribute to poor engineering, run-off, sewage leaks, pollution, traffic, noise and so on in a project that most certainly will not have any enforced oversight.
Size comparisons
The proposed West End Ferry terminal is six times bigger than Road Town’s terminal and rivals Red Hook’s. How can a project of this magnitude not contribute to loss of anchorage and significant maritime congestion at Sopers Hole, when a quarter of the harbour will become landfill? All resident and business traffic, taxis and passengers will be using the same small access road, while the barge and container ramp will make Sopers Hole a potential industrial site.
For many visitors, this harbour is the first impression of the VI: a culturally inspired, picturesque working community with the potential of becoming a charming yacht charter destination if imaginatively developed. Keep a smaller upgraded dock in Sopers Hole, but move the potential commercial centre, and possible official port of entry, complete with new post office, to the Towers/Zion Hill area, where there are other businesses, barge ramps and room to expand. The $6 million strip purchased at Sopers Hole will be available for alternative development plans like further yacht docking.
‘Disaster in the making’
The proposed West End ferry terminal is a disaster in the making. More importantly, to move ahead when bids are already over budget is irresponsible. Banks loans have to be reimbursed by VI taxpayers regardless. Ferry dock upgrades are sorely needed, but the size projected at Sopers Hole is not necessary.
Government officials are convinced they know better than experts. Politicians from both parties have often been heavy handed when it comes to controversial projects. I am waiting for the day when both parties, instead of being adversarial, will compromise and partner with the people for a better product. Please keep the renovation simple and efficient — not a monument to egos.